--- title: 'Sequential and Orthogonalised PLS Discriminant Analysis' author: "Marion Brandolini-Bunlon" date: "`r format(Sys.time(), '%B %d, %Y')`" vignette: > %\VignetteIndexEntry{Sequential and Orthogonalised PLS Discriminant Analysis} %\VignetteEngine{knitr::rmarkdown} %\VignetteEncoding{UTF-8} output: html_document: code_folding: show df_print: kable highlight: pygments number_sections: yes self_contained: yes theme: journal toc: yes toc_depth: 4 toc_float: collapsed: true smooth_scroll: true editor_options: chunk_output_type: console --- # The Sequential and Orthogonalised PLS Discriminant Analysis method Metabolomics is a powerful phenotyping tool, generating complex data that need dedicated treatments to enrich knowledge of biological systems. In particular, to investigate relations between experimental factors and metabolism, discriminant statistical analyses are generally performed on metabolomic datasets. In this context, the SOPLSDA method makes it possible to assess the complementarity of data blocks in predicting or explaining a categorical variable. A selection of reduced datasets from an article of Zhang et al. have been used to illustrate the method application. (Zhang, Y.; Barupal, D.K.; Fan, S.; Gao, B.; Zhu, C.; Flenniken, A.M.; McKerlie, C.; Nutter, L.M.J.; Lloyd, K.C.K.; Fiehn, O. Sexual Dimorphism of the Mouse Plasma Metabolome Is Associated with Phenotypes of 30 Gene Knockout Lines. Metabolites 2023, 13, 947. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13080947). Plasma were analyzed by several metabolomics platforms. In our example, the objective is to highlight metabolites discriminating males and females. # R environment preparation ```{r setup, class.source='fold-hide', warning=FALSE} #install.packages("knitr") library(knitr) opts_chunk$set(echo = TRUE) # To ensure reproducibility set.seed(12) ``` ```{r packages_installation, eval=FALSE, class.source='fold-hide'} pkgs <- c("rchemo") sapply(pkgs, function(x) { if (!requireNamespace(x, quietly = TRUE)) { install.packages(x) } }) ``` ```{r packages_load, warning=FALSE, message=FALSE, class.source='fold-hide'} library(rchemo) # to load rchemo ``` # Data preprocessing A demonstration dataset used for this example is imported. It contains 2 metabolomics datasets and 1 sample metadata block, with the groups to be discriminated. ```{r import_Zhang2023} data(Zhang2023, package = "rchemo") ``` All data blocks should have exactly the same samples (rows). The block dimension can be checked with the following command: ```{r check_dims, class.source='fold-hide'} # Check dimension BlockNames <- c("GCTOF", "HILICPOS", "metadata") nbrBlocs <- length(BlockNames) dims <- lapply(X=Zhang2023[BlockNames], FUN=dim) names(dims) <- BlockNames dims # Remove unuseful object for the next steps rm(nbrBlocs, dims) ``` The identical order of samples in the three blocks should be ensured. ```{r check_orders_and_names, class.source='fold-hide'} # Check rows names in any order row_names <- lapply(X=Zhang2023[BlockNames], FUN=rownames) rns <- do.call(cbind, row_names) rns.unique <- apply(rns, 1, function(x) length(unique(x))) if (max(rns.unique) > 1) { stop("Rows names are not identical between blocks.") } # Check order of samples check_row_names <- all(sapply(X=row_names, FUN=identical, y = row_names[[1]])) if (!check_row_names && max(rns.unique) == 1) { print("Rows names are not in the same order for all blocks.") } # Remove unuseful object for the next steps rm(row_names, rns, rns.unique, check_row_names) ``` ```{r change_data_format} GCTOF <- Zhang2023$GCTOF HILICPOS <- Zhang2023$HILICPOS sample_metadata <- Zhang2023$metadata rm(Zhang2023) ``` # Data visualization by PCA on separate data blocks PCA on different datablocks is necessary to verify that there is no outlier, and that the data scaling is suited. In our example, unit variance scaling is suited: For both metabolomic dataset, the scatterplot of loadings is homogeneous, and there are no outliers. With other datasets, particularly those containing more noise, it would have been necessary to apply a log transformation with Pareto scaling. ```{r PCA_separate_datablocks, class.source='fold-hide'} # GCTOF with unit variance scaling pcaGCTOF <- pcanipalsna(X = scale(GCTOF[,1:dim(GCTOF)[2]]), nlv = nrow(GCTOF), gs = TRUE, tol = .Machine$double.eps^0.5, maxit = 200) ## diagram of explained variance barplot(summary(pcaGCTOF,X = scale(GCTOF[,1:dim(GCTOF)[2]]))$explvar$pvar * 100, names.arg = 1:nrow(GCTOF), main = "diagram of explained variance - PCA GCTOF") ## score plot plotxy(X= pcaGCTOF$T, group = sample_metadata$Gender, asp = 0, col = 3:4, alpha.f = .8, zeroes = TRUE, circle = FALSE, ellipse = FALSE, labels = FALSE, legend = TRUE, main = "scores - PCA GCTOF", ncol = 1, pch=16) ## loading plot plotxy(X= pcaGCTOF$P, group = NULL, asp = 0, col = NULL, alpha.f = .8, zeroes = TRUE, circle = FALSE, ellipse = FALSE, labels = TRUE, legend = FALSE, main = "loadings - PCA GCTOF", ncol = 1, cex=0.8) #HILICPOS with unit variance scaling pcaHILICPOS <- pcanipalsna(X = scale(HILICPOS[,1:dim(HILICPOS)[2]]), nlv = nrow(HILICPOS), gs = TRUE, tol = .Machine$double.eps^0.5, maxit = 200) ## diagram of explained variance barplot(summary(pcaHILICPOS,X = scale(HILICPOS[,1:dim(HILICPOS)[2]]))$explvar$pvar * 100, names.arg = 1:nrow(HILICPOS), main = "diagram of explained variance - PCA HILIC POS") ## score plot plotxy(X= pcaHILICPOS$T, group = sample_metadata$Gender, asp = 0, col = 3:4, alpha.f = .8, zeroes = TRUE, circle = FALSE, ellipse = FALSE, labels = FALSE, legend = TRUE, main = "scores - PCA HILIC POS", ncol = 1, pch=16) ## loading plot plotxy(X= pcaHILICPOS$P, group = NULL, asp = 0, col = NULL, alpha.f = .8, zeroes = TRUE, circle = FALSE, ellipse = FALSE, labels = TRUE, legend = FALSE, main = "loadings - PCA HILIC POS", ncol = 1, cex=0.8) # Remove unuseful object for the next steps rm(pcaGCTOF, pcaHILICPOS) ``` # SO-PLS-DA model In SO-PLS-DA, datablocks are involved sequentially in the model. - The first explanatory block is scaled and a PLS-DA model is build to predict the response variable. - Then, the next explanatory block is orthogonalised to the PLS components, before a PLS model to explain the residuals, etc... - The final prediction is the results of the sum of the predictions by the PLS models. The interpretation is based on the separate PLS models included in the SO-PLS modelling. The main steps to apply this method are: - the determination of the optimal number of latent variables of each model included in the SO-PLS-DA one, proposed in the package by cross-validation - the model validation, proposed by permutation test - the model analysis, based on the scatter plot, the loading plot, the Variable Importance in Projection of each PLS model - the calculation of the predicted categories for each observation. In rchemo, all these steps can be performed with a single function. - Xlist: list of training X-data (n, p). - Xnames: names of the X-matrices - Xscaling: vector of Xlist length. X variable scaling among "none" (mean-centering only), "pareto" (mean-centering and pareto scaling), "sd" (mean-centering and unit variance scaling). If "pareto" or "sd", uncorrected standard deviation is used. - Y: Training Y-data (n, 1). - Yscaling: Y variable scaling among "none" (mean-centering only), "pareto" (mean-centering and pareto scaling), "sd" (mean-centering and unit variance scaling). If "pareto" or "sd", uncorrected standard deviation is used. - weights Weights (n, 1) to apply to the training observations. Internally, weights are "normalized" to sum to 1. Default to NULL (weights are set to 1/n). - newXlist: list of new X-data (m, p) to consider. - newXnames: names of the newX-matrices - method: method to apply among "soplsrda","soplslda","soplsqda" - prior: for soplslda or soplsqda models : The prior probabilities of the classes. Possible values are "unif" (default; probabilities are set equal for all the classes) or "prop" (probabilities are set equal to the observed proportions of the classes in y). - step: step of the analysis among "nlvtest" (cross-validation to help determine the optimal number of latent variables), "permutation" (permutation test), "model" (model calculation),"prediction" (prediction of newX-data or X-data if any)) - nlv: if step is not "nlvtest". A vector of same length as the number of blocks defining the number of scores to calculate for each block, or a single number. In this last case, the same number of scores is used for all the blocks. - nlvlist: if step is not "nlvtest". A list of same length as the number of X-blocks. Each component of the list gives the number of PLS components of the corresponding X-block to test. - modeloutput: if step is "model": outputs among "scores", "loadings", "coef" (regression coefficients), "vip" (Variable Importance in Projection; the VIP calculation being based on the proportion of Y-variance explained by the components, as proposed by Mehmood et al (2012, 2020).) - cvmethod: if step is "nlvtest" or "permutation": "kfolds" for k-folds cross-validation, or "loo" for leave-one-out. - nbrep: if step is "nlvtest" and cvmethod is "kfolds": An integer, setting the number of CV repetitions. Default value is 30. Must me set to 1 if cvmethod is "loo" - seed: if step is "nlvtest" and cvmethod is "kfolds", or if step is "permutation: a numeric. Seed used for the repeated resampling - samplingk: A vector of length n. The elements are the values of a qualitative variable used for stratified partition creation. If NULL, the first observation is set in the first fold, the second observation in the second fold, etc... - nfolds: if cvmethod is "kfolds". An integer, setting the number of partitions to create.Default value is 10. - npermut: if step is "permutation": An integer, setting the number of Y-Block with permutated responses to create. Default value is 30. - optimisation: if step is "nlvtest", method for the error optimisation among "global" (the optimal number of latent variables is determined after all the ordred block combination have been computed), or "sequential" (the optimal number of latent variables is determined after each addition of X-block). - criterion: if step is "nlvtest" or "permutation" and method is "soplsrda", "soplslda" or "soplsqda": optimisation criterion among "rmse" and "err" (for classification error rate))) - selection: if step is "nlvtest": a character indicating the selection method to use to choose the optimal combination of components, among "localmin", "globalmin","1std". If "localmin": the optimal combination corresponds to the first local minimum of the mean CV rmse or error rate. If "globalmin" : the optimal combination corresponds to the minimum mean CV rmse or error rate. If "1std" (one standard error rule) : it corresponds to the first combination after which the mean cross-validated rmse or error rate does not decrease significantly. ## determination by cross-validation of the optimal number of latent variables of the model In this example,the soplslda method with an uniform prior is performed: a linear discriminant analysis is applied on the PLS scores to obtain the classifications. In the soplsrda method, the classification step is performed according to the predicted value, and consequently, it doesn't take into account the variance of the scatter plot. And the soplsqda method is mode suited when the scatter plot has an atypical shape. The cvmethod is to choose according to the number of observations. If this number is small, a leave-one-out cross-validation is more suited, but can lead to optimistic results. In the other cases, it could be better to apply a k-fold cross-validation, usually with 3, 5 or 10 folds. In order to reduce the computational time, in this example, the number of cross- validation repetition is set to 10. But it must be higher (at least 30). Concerning the criterion, in a discriminant context, it is more logical to choose the classification error rate. However, this can result in an error plot depending on the number of latent variables that is not smooth, so some prefer to use rmsecv instead. In the example, the selection parameter is set to "localmin". Normally, the cross-validated error decreases until it reaches the optimal number of latent variables, before rising again. Sometimes it fluctuates before this rise, so choosing “localmin” allows for a more parsimonious model. The “1std” option is also very parsimonious because it only considers a larger number of latent variables if doing so significantly improves the cross-validated error. The plot of the results (called "Mage plot) indicates the number of latent variables of each block, and the corresponding error rates and sum of latent variables. ```{r run_nlvtest} nlvtestsoplsda <- soplsr_soplsda_allsteps(Xlist = list(GCTOF = GCTOF[,1:dim(GCTOF)[2]], HILICPOS = HILICPOS[,1:dim(HILICPOS)[2]]), Xnames = c("GCTOF", "HILICPOS"), Xscaling = c("none","pareto","sd")[3], Y = sample_metadata[,"Gender",drop=FALSE], Yscaling = c("none","pareto","sd")[1], weights = NULL, newXlist = NULL, newXnames = NULL, method = c("soplsrda","soplslda","soplsqda")[2], prior = c("unif", "prop")[1], step = c("nlvtest","permutation","model","prediction")[1], # nlv = c(), nlvlist = list(0:3, 0:3), modeloutput = c("scores","loadings","coef","vip"), cvmethod = c("kfolds","loo")[1], nbrep = 10, seed = 123, samplingk = NULL, nfolds = 3, # npermut = 30, optimisation = c("global","sequential")[1], criterion = c("err","rmse")[1], selection = c("localmin","globalmin","1std")[1], import = c("R","ChemFlow","W4M")[1], outputfilename = NULL) # to plot the results of the cross-validation plot(nlvtestsoplsda[,"nlvsum"],nlvtestsoplsda[,"mean"], type = "n", xlab = "nlv sum", ylab = "classification error rate", main = "error rates obtained from the different numbers \n of latent variable combinaisons of the 2 datablocks") text(x=nlvtestsoplsda[,"nlvsum"], y=nlvtestsoplsda[,"mean"], labels=paste0(nlvtestsoplsda[,"Xlist1"],",",nlvtestsoplsda[,"Xlist2"])) nlvoptsoplsda <- nlvtestsoplsda[which(nlvtestsoplsda[,"optimum"]==1),c("Xlist1","Xlist2")] # to obtain the optimal number of LV. # Remove unuseful object for the next steps rm(nlvtestsoplsda) ``` ## model validation by permutation test Usually, the cross-validation parameters are the same than for the determination of the optimal number of latent variables. In this example, as for the determination of the optimal number of latent variables, in order to reduce the computational time, the number of cross- validation repetition and the number of permuted responses are set to 10. But they must be higher (at least 30). To be valid, all the cross-validated errors obtained on permuted data must be lower than the cross-validated error obtained on the original data. ```{r run_permutation} permutsoplsda <- soplsr_soplsda_allsteps(Xlist = list(GCTOF = GCTOF[,1:dim(GCTOF)[2]], HILICPOS = HILICPOS[,1:dim(HILICPOS)[2]]), Xnames = c("GCTOF", "HILICPOS"), Xscaling = c("none","pareto","sd")[3], Y = sample_metadata[,"Gender",drop=FALSE], Yscaling = c("none","pareto","sd")[1], weights = NULL, newXlist = NULL, newXnames = NULL, method = c("soplsrda","soplslda","soplsqda")[2], prior = c("unif", "prop")[1], step = c("nlvtest","permutation","model","prediction")[2], nlv = nlvoptsoplsda, #nlvlist = list(), modeloutput = c("scores","loadings","coef","vip"), cvmethod = c("kfolds","loo")[1], nbrep = 10, seed = 123, samplingk = NULL, nfolds = 3, npermut = 10, # optimisation = c("global","sequential")[1], criterion = c("err","rmse")[1], # selection = c("localmin","globalmin","1std")[1], import = c("R","ChemFlow","W4M")[1], outputfilename = NULL) #plot of the results plot(permutsoplsda, pch = 16, ylab = "CV classification error rate", xlab = "dyssimilarity Y-Ypermuted") # Remove unuseful object for the next steps rm(permutsoplsda) ``` ## model analysis, based on the scatter plot, the loading plot, the Variable Importance in Projection The score plot allows to show the group discrimination. Based on the VIP curve, the threshold to consider that a variable is important can be set. NOTE: In our example, only the HILICPOS matrix is retained by the SO-PLS-DA method to discriminate the groups. If both matrices had been retained, there would have been two loading plots and two VIP curves, and the scores obtained from the two matrices would have been concatenated. ```{r run_model} modelsoplsda <- soplsr_soplsda_allsteps(Xlist = list(GCTOF = GCTOF[,1:dim(GCTOF)[2]], HILICPOS = HILICPOS[,1:dim(HILICPOS)[2]]), Xnames = c("GCTOF", "HILICPOS"), Xscaling = c("none","pareto","sd")[3], Y = sample_metadata[,"Gender",drop=FALSE], Yscaling = c("none","pareto","sd")[1], weights = NULL, newXlist = NULL, newXnames = NULL, method = c("soplsrda","soplslda","soplsqda")[2], prior = c("unif", "prop")[1], step = c("nlvtest","permutation","model","prediction")[3], nlv = nlvoptsoplsda, #nlvlist = list(), modeloutput = c("scores","loadings","coef","vip"), # cvmethod = c("kfolds","loo")[1], # nbrep = 30, # seed = 123, # samplingk = NULL, # nfolds = 5, # npermut = 30, # # criterion = c("err","rmse")[1], # selection = c("localmin","globalmin","1std")[1], import = c("R","ChemFlow","W4M")[1], outputfilename = NULL) # score plot plotxy(do.call("cbind",modelsoplsda$scores)[,1:2], group = sample_metadata[,"Gender"], asp = 0, col = 3:4, alpha.f = .8, zeroes = TRUE, circle = FALSE, ellipse = FALSE, labels = FALSE, legend = TRUE, main = "scores - SO PLS DA", ncol = 1, pch=16, xlab="lv1 HILICPOS", ylab="lv2 HILICPOS") # loading plot plotxy(modelsoplsda$loadings[[2]], pch = 16, xlab="lv1 HILICPOS", ylab="lv2 HILICPOS", main = "loadings - SO PLS DA") # vip curve plot(modelsoplsda$vip[[2]][order(modelsoplsda$vip[[2]][,2], decreasing = TRUE),1,drop=FALSE], pch = 16, ylab = "VIP", xlab="HILICPOS variables", main = "VIP curve SO PLS DA") # Remove unuseful object for the next steps rm(modelsoplsda) ``` ## predicted values The prediction step provides a table with: - subjects scores - predicted categories - probabilities to be predicted for each category. ```{r run_prediction} predsoplsda <- soplsr_soplsda_allsteps(Xlist = list(GCTOF = GCTOF[,1:dim(GCTOF)[2]], HILICPOS = HILICPOS[,1:dim(HILICPOS)[2]]), Xnames = c("GCTOF", "HILICPOS"), Xscaling = c("none","pareto","sd")[3], Y = sample_metadata[,"Gender",drop=FALSE], Yscaling = c("none","pareto","sd")[1], weights = NULL, newXlist = list(GCTOF = GCTOF[,1:dim(GCTOF)[2]], HILICPOS = HILICPOS[,1:dim(HILICPOS)[2]]), newXnames = c("GCTOF", "HILICPOS"), method = c("soplsrda","soplslda","soplsqda")[2], prior = c("unif", "prop")[1], step = c("nlvtest","permutation","model","prediction")[4], nlv = nlvoptsoplsda, # nlvlist = list(), # modeloutput = c("scores","loadings","coef","vip"), # # cvmethod = c("kfolds","loo")[1], # nbrep = 30, # seed = 123, # samplingk = NULL, # nfolds = 5, # npermut = 30, # # criterion = c("err","rmse")[1], # selection = c("localmin","globalmin","1std")[1], # import = c("R","ChemFlow","W4M")[1], outputfilename = NULL) predsoplsda # Remove unuseful object for the next steps rm(predsoplsda, nlvoptsoplsda) ``` # Reproducibility This vignette was produced with the following R session configuration. ```{r reproducibility} sessionInfo() ```